As I write this early on 23rd November 2020, the media is full of stories that Boris Johnson is planning to remove or reduce public protections against Covid-19, in part so that the public in England can have a less abnormal Christmas. An announcement is expected in the House of Commons later today.
In this post I want to ask a basic question.
Is it lawful for Boris Johnson to remove or reduce public protections against Covid-19?
Boris Johnson must know that removing or reducing public protections will result in an increase in Covid-19 infections.
In turn, Boris Johnson must know that an increase in Covid-19 infections will cause an increase in Covid-19 deaths.
So, is it lawful for the Prime Minister to act in a way which he knows will cause deaths in the population of England?
If it's supposedly lawful, what is the reasoning that produces a conclusion that reducing public protections against Covid-19 with the effect of causing avoidable deaths is lawful?
If it's not lawful, what should it be called?
Might it be Gross Negligence Manslaughter?
Might it be Murder?
No comments:
Post a Comment